July 16, 2019 Volume 15 Issue 27
 

Designfax weekly eMagazine

Subscribe Today!
image of Designfax newsletter

Archives

View Archives

Partners

Manufacturing Center
Product Spotlight

Modern Applications News
Metalworking Ideas For
Today's Job Shops

Tooling and Production
Strategies for large
metalworking plants

Interesting! How you charge your mobile phone could compromise its battery lifespan

Researchers at the Warwick Manufacturing Group (WMG) at the University of Warwick in the UK have found that use of inductive charging, while highly convenient, risks depleting the life of mobile phones using typical LIBs (Lithium-ion batteries).

Consumers and manufacturers have ramped up their interest in this convenient charging technology, abandoning fiddling with plugs and cables in a favor of just setting the phone directly on a charging base.

Standardization of charging stations, and inclusion of inductive charging coils in many new smartphones, has led to rapidly increasing adoption of the technology. In 2017, 15 automobile models announced the inclusion of consoles within vehicles for inductively charging consumer electronic devices, such as smartphones -- and at a much larger scale, many are considering it for charging electric vehicle batteries.

Inductive charging enables a power source to transmit energy across an air gap, without the use of connecting wire, but one of the main issues with this mode of charging is the amount of unwanted -- and potentially damaging -- heat that can be generated. There are several sources of heat generation associated with any inductive charging system in both the charger and the device being charged. This additional heating is made worse by the fact that the device and the charging base are in close physical contact, and any heat generated in one device may be transferred to the other by simple thermal conduction and convection.

In a smartphone, the power-receiving coil is close to the back cover of the phone (which is usually electrically nonconductive), and packaging constraints necessitate placement of the phone's battery and power electronics in close proximity, with limited opportunities to dissipate heat generated in the phone or to shield the phone from heat generated by the charger. It has been well documented that batteries age more quickly when stored at elevated temperatures and that exposure to higher temperatures can thus significantly influence the state of health (SoH) of batteries over their useful lifetime.

The rule of thumb (or more technically the Arrhenuis equation) is that for most chemical reactions, the reaction rate doubles with each 10 degrees C rise in temperature. In a battery, the reactions that can occur include the accelerated growth rate of passivating films (a thin inert coating making the surface underneath unreactive) on the cell's electrodes. This occurs by way of cell redox reactions, which irreversibly increase the internal resistance of the cell, ultimately resulting in performance degradation and failure. A lithium-ion battery dwelling above 30 C is typically considered to be at elevated temperature, exposing the battery to risk of a shortened useful life.

Guidelines issued by battery manufacturers also specify that the upper operational temperature range of their products should not surpass the 50 to 60 C range to avoid gas generation and catastrophic failure.

These facts led WMG researchers to carry out experiments comparing the temperature rises in normal battery charging by wire with inductive charging. However, the WMG researchers were even more interested in inductive charging when the consumer misaligns the phone on the charging base. To compensate for poor alignment of the phone and the charger, inductive charging systems typically increase the transmitter power and/or adjust their operating frequency, which incurs further efficiency losses and increases heat generation.

This misalignment can be a very common occurrence, because the actual position of the receiving antenna in the phone is not always intuitive or obvious to the consumer using the phone. The WMG research team therefore also tested phone charging with deliberate misalignment of transmitter and receiver coils.

All three charging methods (wire, aligned inductive, and misaligned inductive) were tested with simultaneous charging and thermal imaging over time to generate temperature maps to help quantify the heating effects. The results of those experiments have been published in the journal ACS Energy Letters in an article entitled, "Temperature Considerations for Charging Li-Ion Batteries: Inductive versus Mains Charging Modes for Portable Electronic Devices."

Three modes of charging, based on (a) AC mains (cable) charging and inductive charging when coils are (b) aligned and (c) misaligned. Panels i and ii show a snapshot of the thermal maps of the phone after 50 min. of charging. Regardless of charging mode, the right edge of the phone showed a higher rate of increase in temperature than other areas of the phone and remained higher throughout the charging process. A CT scan showed this hotspot is where the motherboard is located. [Credit: WMG, University of Warwick]

 

 

 

 

Results:

  • In the case of the phone charged with conventional mains power, the maximum average temperature reached within 3 hours of charging did not exceed 27 C.
  • In contrast, for the phone charged by aligned inductive charging, the temperature peaked at 30.5 C but gradually reduced for the latter half of the charging period. This is similar to the maximum average temperature observed during misaligned inductive charging.
  • In the case of misaligned inductive charging, the peak temperature was of similar magnitude (30.5 C), but this temperature was reached sooner and persisted for much longer at this level (125 min. vs. 55 min. for properly aligned charging).

Also noteworthy was the fact that the maximum input power to the charging base was greater in the test where the phone was misaligned (11 W) than the well-aligned phone (9.5 W). This is due to the charging system increasing the transmitter power under misalignment in order to maintain target input power to the device. The maximum average temperature of the charging base while charging under misalignment reached 35.3 C, two degrees higher than the temperature detected when the phone was aligned, which achieved 33 C. This is symptomatic of deterioration in system efficiency, with additional heat generation attributable to power electronics losses and eddy currents.

The researchers do note that future approaches to inductive charging design can diminish these transfer losses, and thus reduce heating, by using ultrathin coils, higher frequencies, and optimized drive electronics to provide chargers and receivers that are compact and more efficient and can be integrated into mobile devices or batteries with minimal change.

In conclusion, the research team found that inductive charging, while convenient, will likely lead to a reduction in the life of the mobile phone battery. For many users, this degradation may be an acceptable price for the convenience of charging, but for those wishing to eke out the longest life from their phone, cable charging is still recommended.

While one specific model of mobile phone was used to conduct the tests, the issues raised can be applied to all phones or portable devices now or in the future that seek to use inductive charging.

Source: University of Warwick

Published July 2019

Rate this article

[Interesting! How you charge your mobile phone could compromise its battery lifespan]

Very interesting, with information I can use
Interesting, with information I may use
Interesting, but not applicable to my operation
Not interesting or inaccurate

E-mail Address (required):

Comments:


Type the number:



Copyright © 2019 by Nelson Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction Prohibited.
View our terms of use and privacy policy